Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2185: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.121176514845936,1.28084940612152

Latest revision as of 12:00, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2185_mature_Adipocyte_Hepatocyte_skin_liver_skeletal_left



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:109577279..109577289,+p15@ACACB
Hg19::chr12:109577376..109577404,+p21@ACACB
Hg19::chr20:33464407..33464423,+p1@ACSS2
Hg19::chr4:185726631..185726658,-p@chr4:185726631..185726658
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


p.valueFDRnGenesnPathwayName
1.91447319275479e-060.000403953843671262240Pyruvate metabolism (KEGG):00620
1.21740859436715e-060.000385309820117203232Propanoate metabolism (KEGG):00640
5.66978599392766e-070.000358897453415621222Fatty Acid Biosynthesis (Wikipathways):WP357



Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008610lipid biosynthetic process0.00264916256568538
GO:0003989acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity0.00264916256568538
GO:0004075biotin carboxylase activity0.00264916256568538
GO:0016421CoA carboxylase activity0.00298004468581734
GO:0016874ligase activity0.00298004468581734
GO:0016885ligase activity, forming carbon-carbon bonds0.00298004468581734
GO:0044255cellular lipid metabolic process0.00298004468581734
GO:0003987acetate-CoA ligase activity0.00298004468581734
GO:0016405CoA-ligase activity0.00348582846459488
GO:0006629lipid metabolic process0.00348582846459488
GO:0009374biotin binding0.00419351958115085
GO:0016878acid-thiol ligase activity0.00419351958115085
GO:0016208AMP binding0.00427828266515267
GO:0016877ligase activity, forming carbon-sulfur bonds0.00529637549745431
GO:0006633fatty acid biosynthetic process0.0128793076472514
GO:0046394carboxylic acid biosynthetic process0.0129189165628106
GO:0016053organic acid biosynthetic process0.0129189165628106
GO:0009058biosynthetic process0.0130401524453593
GO:0032559adenyl ribonucleotide binding0.0162566837917713
GO:0030554adenyl nucleotide binding0.0167888630484699
GO:0030145manganese ion binding0.0185048333400419
GO:0032553ribonucleotide binding0.0206711729655838
GO:0032555purine ribonucleotide binding0.0206711729655838
GO:0006631fatty acid metabolic process0.0206711729655838
GO:0017076purine nucleotide binding0.0206711729655838
GO:0019842vitamin binding0.0248743443344147
GO:0000166nucleotide binding0.026251361438029
GO:0032787monocarboxylic acid metabolic process0.0270404086116589
GO:0016879ligase activity, forming carbon-nitrogen bonds0.0337074386028396



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fat cell1.38e-1515
stuff accumulating cell1.01e-0787
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism2.18e-34114
neural tube9.63e-0956
neural rod9.63e-0956
future spinal cord9.63e-0956
neural keel9.63e-0956
neural plate2.77e-0782
presumptive neural plate2.77e-0782
regional part of nervous system8.85e-0753
regional part of brain8.85e-0753


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0214529
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.12.52375
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.866596
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.11.08195
MA0146.10.481
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.22.52211
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.21.09513
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.649108
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.309472
MA0163.10.253219
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.327251
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SREBF1#6720223.50292472024410.002638454900768240.0145820813558414
SREBF2#67211109.2358156028370.009123201484126820.034514889509553



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.