Coexpression cluster:C311

Full id: C311_rectal_heart_choriocarcinoma_placenta_chorionic_lung_ductal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:118826999..118827014,+	p1@UPK2
Hg19::chr11:86502063..86502074,+	p26@PRSS23
Hg19::chr11:86502085..86502118,+	p13@PRSS23
Hg19::chr11:89901127..89901133,+	p@chr11:89901127..89901133 +
Hg19::chr12:31632584..31632589,-	p20@DENND5B
Hg19::chr12:31632597..31632607,-	p13@DENND5B
Hg19::chr12:57410306..57410318,-	p1@TAC3
Hg19::chr15:54134723..54134734,+	p@chr15:54134723..54134734 +
Hg19::chr1:172421915..172421926,+	p4@C1orf105
Hg19::chr1:172421997..172422007,+	p3@C1orf105
Hg19::chr1:172422026..172422039,+	p2@C1orf105
Hg19::chr1:172422041..172422055,+	p1@C1orf105
Hg19::chr1:43533230..43533270,+	p@chr1:43533230..43533270 +
Hg19::chr1:90420182..90420201,+	p@chr1:90420182..90420201 +
Hg19::chr20:3999149..3999160,-	p@chr20:3999149..3999160 -
Hg19::chr2:191384421..191384433,-	p@chr2:191384421..191384433 -
Hg19::chr2:191384465..191384471,-	p@chr2:191384465..191384471 -
Hg19::chr2:197124712..197124735,+	p2@ENST00000430904
Hg19::chr2:209864821..209864831,-	p@chr2:209864821..209864831 -
Hg19::chr4:10048437..10048443,+	p@chr4:10048437..10048443 +
Hg19::chr4:175309496..175309506,+	p@chr4:175309496..175309506 +
Hg19::chr6:125540918..125540931,+	p6@TPD52L1
Hg19::chr6:31683061..31683070,+	p5@LY6G6D
Hg19::chr6:31683080..31683091,+	p2@LY6G6D
Hg19::chr6:31683117..31683130,+	p1@LY6G6D
Hg19::chr6:31683157..31683167,+	p3@LY6G6D
Hg19::chr7:12007288..12007295,-	p@chr7:12007288..12007295 -
Hg19::chr7:12125449..12125453,-	p@chr7:12125449..12125453 -
Hg19::chr7:12134329..12134354,-	p@chr7:12134329..12134354 -
Hg19::chr7:12134356..12134370,-	p@chr7:12134356..12134370 -
Hg19::chr7:12134371..12134377,-	p@chr7:12134371..12134377 -
Hg19::chr7:12134400..12134410,-	p@chr7:12134400..12134410 -
Hg19::chr7:12250342..12250347,+	p@chr7:12250342..12250347 +
Hg19::chr7:16873035..16873059,-	p6@AGR2
Hg19::chr7:27282288..27282293,-	p2@ENST00000519050
Hg19::chr7:27282416..27282426,+	p1@EVX1
Hg19::chr8:120164231..120164239,+	p@chr8:120164231..120164239 +
Hg19::chr9:20732373..20732384,+	p@chr9:20732373..20732384 +
Hg19::chr9:286553..286563,+	p@chr9:286553..286563 +

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
endo-epithelial cell	1.20e-07	43

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	8.44e-23	115
regional part of forebrain	7.03e-13	41
forebrain	7.03e-13	41
future forebrain	7.03e-13	41
telencephalon	1.08e-12	34
gray matter	1.52e-12	34
brain grey matter	1.52e-12	34
cerebral hemisphere	1.77e-12	32
regional part of telencephalon	3.32e-12	33
neural tube	3.95e-12	57
neural rod	3.95e-12	57
future spinal cord	3.95e-12	57
neural keel	3.95e-12	57
anterior neural tube	4.56e-12	42
central nervous system	3.30e-11	82
regional part of nervous system	1.86e-10	94
nervous system	1.86e-10	94
regional part of cerebral cortex	2.03e-10	22
cerebral cortex	8.96e-10	25
pallium	8.96e-10	25
neocortex	1.19e-09	20
neural plate	1.24e-09	86
presumptive neural plate	1.24e-09	86
pre-chordal neural plate	1.36e-09	61
neurectoderm	3.82e-09	90
organ	8.35e-09	511
regional part of brain	1.59e-08	59
brain	1.94e-08	69
future brain	1.94e-08	69
anterior region of body	2.25e-08	129
craniocervical region	2.25e-08	129
ectoderm-derived structure	7.97e-08	169
ectoderm	1.35e-07	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.35e-07	173
organ part	1.65e-07	219
head	1.79e-07	123
embryo	8.16e-07	612

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
carcinoma	3.03e-08	106

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
TAL1#6886	5	3.82930983044105	0.00937650864813089	0.0353860369553423

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.