Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2813: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C2813_migratory_Dendritic_acute_immature_Whole_CD14_Monocytederived |id=C2813 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|full_id=C2813_migratory_Dendritic_acute_immature_Whole_CD14_Monocytederived
|full_id=C2813_migratory_Dendritic_acute_immature_Whole_CD14_Monocytederived
|id=C2813
|id=C2813
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0000738!3.75e-49!140;CL:0002087!2.33e-48!119;CL:0002031!2.64e-43!124;CL:0000037!1.49e-39!172;CL:0000566!1.49e-39!172;CL:0000988!4.31e-39!182;CL:0002032!9.41e-37!165;CL:0000837!9.41e-37!165;CL:0002009!5.51e-36!65;CL:0002194!3.71e-34!63;CL:0000576!3.71e-34!63;CL:0000040!3.71e-34!63;CL:0000559!3.71e-34!63;CL:0000557!3.61e-33!71;CL:0002057!5.50e-31!42;CL:0000839!2.42e-29!70;CL:0000766!7.54e-29!76;CL:0000860!1.49e-27!45;CL:0000763!1.40e-22!112;CL:0000049!1.40e-22!112;CL:0000945!2.69e-15!24;CL:0000826!2.69e-15!24;CL:0000542!6.45e-13!53;CL:0000051!6.45e-13!53;CL:0000838!3.15e-12!52;CL:0000451!2.73e-10!10;CL:0000236!1.50e-09!14;CL:0000990!1.89e-09!8
|ontology_enrichment_disease=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0002390!2.37e-41!102;UBERON:0003061!2.37e-41!102;UBERON:0002193!4.58e-38!112;UBERON:0002371!7.76e-30!80;UBERON:0007023!8.29e-28!115;UBERON:0001474!1.67e-26!86;UBERON:0002405!6.06e-24!115;UBERON:0004765!2.47e-19!101;UBERON:0001434!2.47e-19!101;UBERON:0003081!1.88e-11!216;UBERON:0000178!1.61e-09!15;UBERON:0000179!1.61e-09!15;UBERON:0000463!1.61e-09!15;UBERON:0001049!6.10e-07!57;UBERON:0005068!6.10e-07!57;UBERON:0006241!6.10e-07!57;UBERON:0007135!6.10e-07!57
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:28, 21 May 2012


Full id: C2813_migratory_Dendritic_acute_immature_Whole_CD14_Monocytederived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:149781232..149781241,-p@chr5:149781232..149781241
-
Hg19::chr5:149781278..149781285,-p@chr5:149781278..149781285
-
Hg19::chr6:32412734..32412747,+p@chr6:32412734..32412747
+
Hg19::chr6:33054465..33054512,+p@chr6:33054465..33054512
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.75e-49140
nongranular leukocyte2.33e-48119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.64e-43124
hematopoietic stem cell1.49e-39172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.49e-39172
hematopoietic cell4.31e-39182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.41e-37165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.41e-37165
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor5.51e-3665
monopoietic cell3.71e-3463
monocyte3.71e-3463
monoblast3.71e-3463
promonocyte3.71e-3463
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.61e-3371
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.50e-3142
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.42e-2970
myeloid leukocyte7.54e-2976
classical monocyte1.49e-2745
myeloid cell1.40e-22112
common myeloid progenitor1.40e-22112
lymphocyte of B lineage2.69e-1524
pro-B cell2.69e-1524
lymphocyte6.45e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor6.45e-1353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.15e-1252
dendritic cell2.73e-1010
B cell1.50e-0914
conventional dendritic cell1.89e-098
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.37e-41102
blood island2.37e-41102
hemolymphoid system4.58e-38112
bone marrow7.76e-3080
adult organism8.29e-28115
bone element1.67e-2686
immune system6.06e-24115
skeletal element2.47e-19101
skeletal system2.47e-19101
lateral plate mesoderm1.88e-11216
blood1.61e-0915
haemolymphatic fluid1.61e-0915
organism substance1.61e-0915
neural tube6.10e-0757
neural rod6.10e-0757
future spinal cord6.10e-0757
neural keel6.10e-0757


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.