Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2698: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.0287199675136495

Latest revision as of 12:11, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2698_CD19_b_lymphoma_Burkitt_Dendritic_immature_Monocytederived



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:33701352..33701361,+p7@RASGRP3
Hg19::chr2:33701658..33701673,+p2@RASGRP3
Hg19::chr2:33701684..33701702,+p4@RASGRP3
Hg19::chr2:33701707..33701723,+p1@RASGRP3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte9.28e-34136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.99e-32120
nongranular leukocyte1.14e-30115
hematopoietic stem cell1.22e-28168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.22e-28168
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.79e-28161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.79e-28161
hematopoietic cell7.47e-28177
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.71e-1966
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell8.80e-1967
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.85e-1961
myeloid leukocyte2.57e-1872
defensive cell1.09e-1748
phagocyte1.09e-1748
monopoietic cell1.11e-1759
monocyte1.11e-1759
monoblast1.11e-1759
promonocyte1.11e-1759
myeloid cell1.31e-15108
common myeloid progenitor1.31e-15108
classical monocyte3.82e-1442
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.82e-1442
lymphocyte of B lineage3.29e-1324
pro-B cell3.29e-1324
nucleate cell4.81e-1355
lymphocyte3.85e-1253
common lymphoid progenitor3.85e-1253
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.33e-1252
B cell1.97e-0814
stuff accumulating cell1.02e-0787
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism5.67e-30114
hemolymphoid system8.57e-25108
hematopoietic system5.45e-2498
blood island5.45e-2498
immune system1.61e-1893
bone marrow1.27e-1576
bone element1.55e-1382
neural tube9.57e-1256
neural rod9.57e-1256
future spinal cord9.57e-1256
neural keel9.57e-1256
regional part of nervous system2.40e-1053
regional part of brain2.40e-1053
skeletal element1.14e-0990
regional part of forebrain3.17e-0941
forebrain3.17e-0941
anterior neural tube3.17e-0941
future forebrain3.17e-0941
skeletal system4.23e-09100
telencephalon1.96e-0834
brain grey matter2.06e-0834
gray matter2.06e-0834
blood8.44e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid8.44e-0815
organism substance8.44e-0815
neural plate1.07e-0782
presumptive neural plate1.07e-0782
regional part of telencephalon1.77e-0732
cerebral hemisphere2.08e-0732
brain3.83e-0768
future brain3.83e-0768
central nervous system5.33e-0781
neurectoderm5.55e-0786


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0214529
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.11.30988
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.11.8712
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.946082
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.00636811
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.11.70187
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.11.33363
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.11.1497
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.11.43218
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.000248021
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203335.08045629466740.01144298405398240.0419051794107039
GATA2#2624412.7449317335543.78864877853583e-050.000722708109189961
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466396059255817
NFKB1#479045.488063424193840.001102199566301980.00768595983875358
POU2F2#545236.829593043306890.004860473775203740.0227674480000226
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.0079740363205896
SMC3#9126415.04493284493281.95092670935632e-050.000438838756404189
STAT2#6773232.63188559322030.001379588775125520.00898552367230022
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0322782548876772
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244658499977116
TCF12#693837.975848676639820.003090920396013070.0162855733649081
TCF7L2#6934410.77017656313737.42969445082454e-050.00115606355594408
USF1#739134.771124457905970.01370465887188020.0483221089777276



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C2698&oldid=3069815"