Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1792: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=-0.14593817620623

Latest revision as of 11:52, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1792_medial_Neutrophils_Whole_amygdala_occipital_spinal_brain



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:73843026..73843066,-p4@WBP2
Hg19::chr17:73843605..73843662,-p2@WBP2
Hg19::chr17:73843947..73843961,-p3@WBP2
Hg19::chr17:73844722..73844751,-p@chr17:73844722..73844751
-
Hg19::chr17:73845785..73845824,-p@chr17:73845785..73845824
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism3.93e-30114
neural tube3.40e-1956
neural rod3.40e-1956
future spinal cord3.40e-1956
neural keel3.40e-1956
regional part of nervous system1.17e-1753
regional part of brain1.17e-1753
neurectoderm5.29e-1586
neural plate6.74e-1582
presumptive neural plate6.74e-1582
regional part of forebrain7.91e-1541
forebrain7.91e-1541
anterior neural tube7.91e-1541
future forebrain7.91e-1541
central nervous system5.08e-1481
brain grey matter1.80e-1334
gray matter1.80e-1334
telencephalon5.19e-1334
regional part of telencephalon1.48e-1232
brain3.10e-1268
future brain3.10e-1268
cerebral hemisphere3.35e-1232
ecto-epithelium1.14e-11104
pre-chordal neural plate1.29e-1161
regional part of cerebral cortex2.21e-1122
germ layer2.57e-11560
germ layer / neural crest2.57e-11560
embryonic tissue2.57e-11560
presumptive structure2.57e-11560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.57e-11560
epiblast (generic)2.57e-11560
embryo3.78e-11592
nervous system4.62e-1189
multi-cellular organism6.01e-11656
embryonic structure6.32e-11564
developing anatomical structure1.28e-10581
neocortex2.21e-1020
cerebral cortex2.18e-0925
pallium2.18e-0925
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.43e-09132
anatomical system3.09e-08624
anatomical conduit3.58e-08240
tube4.02e-08192
anatomical group5.19e-08625
organ system subdivision5.21e-07223
organ5.66e-07503
ectoderm-derived structure8.42e-07171
ectoderm8.42e-07171
presumptive ectoderm8.42e-07171


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.280184
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.10.161847
MA0017.10.496101
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.11.08193
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.11.01397
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.11.44118
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.782425
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.10.412364
MA0089.10
MA0090.11.36977
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.750974
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.11.12656
MA0105.10.520776
MA0106.10.779931
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.10.973423
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.10.382106
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.12.13391
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.11.29278
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.11.67417
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.6031
MA0147.10.386018
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.20.0575907
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.30855
MA0137.21.20193
MA0104.20.858845
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.21.96224
MA0065.20.880827
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.10.172764
MA0155.10.813062
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.67024
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.469165
MA0163.10.680296
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.20.230892
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
RXRA#6256312.044770283480.001145262162836830.00783557386338133



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.