Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3424: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.431539092849463

Latest revision as of 12:25, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3424_skeletal_tongue_diaphragm_mesenchymal_Fibroblast_basal_smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:35183771..35183784,-p4@CFL2
Hg19::chr14:35183785..35183826,-p1@CFL2
Hg19::chr14:35183837..35183867,-p2@CFL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-tissue structure1.11e-22342
cell layer4.78e-19309
epithelium2.24e-18306
anatomical cluster1.33e-17373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.43e-15132
mesenchyme1.50e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.50e-14160
dense mesenchyme tissue1.67e-1473
paraxial mesoderm2.50e-1472
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.50e-1472
somite3.13e-1471
presomitic mesoderm3.13e-1471
presumptive segmental plate3.13e-1471
dermomyotome3.13e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.13e-1471
trunk mesenchyme1.88e-13122
multi-cellular organism6.01e-13656
epithelial vesicle1.99e-1278
muscle tissue3.04e-1264
musculature3.04e-1264
musculature of body3.04e-1264
skeletal muscle tissue6.94e-1262
striated muscle tissue6.94e-1262
myotome6.94e-1262
anatomical conduit7.87e-12240
anatomical system9.62e-12624
unilaminar epithelium1.02e-11148
anatomical group1.43e-11625
organism subdivision2.72e-11264
multilaminar epithelium4.45e-1183
tube4.74e-10192
adult organism7.87e-10114
trunk1.96e-09199
ectoderm-derived structure4.64e-09171
ectoderm4.64e-09171
presumptive ectoderm4.64e-09171
neural plate8.14e-0982
presumptive neural plate8.14e-0982
organ system subdivision1.07e-08223
nervous system1.72e-0889
neurectoderm2.35e-0886
neural tube9.34e-0856
neural rod9.34e-0856
future spinal cord9.34e-0856
neural keel9.34e-0856
brain1.16e-0768
future brain1.16e-0768
surface structure1.23e-0799
central nervous system1.60e-0781
regional part of nervous system4.19e-0753
regional part of brain4.19e-0753
ecto-epithelium8.14e-07104


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.14.57391
MA0004.13.20493
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.80735
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.15.50871
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.14.67142
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.13.82193
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.12.25834
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.13.73313
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.432958
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.22.13189
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.37721
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.21.54885
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.11.40979
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467322.46317452600878.81932387510763e-050.0012945627072275
BHLHE40#8553344.87181354697741.10603738662898e-050.000284165900669481
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189600777288587
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324337254057748
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321232409530733
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00913676838216309
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0319721687342854
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.0039055087134443
HNF4G#3174328.75342252644684.20470658818262e-050.000755826766545963
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156425350839758
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186129553216269
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293793533538643
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000736227625017155
RXRA#6256320.07461713913330.0001235730348432220.0016503637066485
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275931793293246
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.0054168223584188
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00247726703532623
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00614094693720351
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0189882185738748
USF2#7392312.99219738506960.0004558979393427810.00420986073271625
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0328593795916181
ZEB1#6935316.88843201754390.0002075486917327580.00242327309288737
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00388318191205693



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.