Personal tools

Template:Novel motif: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 161: Line 161:
}}
}}
----
----
<table id="h_pval_table"></table>
<table id="h_pval_table" class="ff_sample_list stripe cell-border order-column compact dataTable no-footer"></table>
<br><br>
<br><br>
{{Fontsize|3|Association to promoter expression in mouse samples}}
{{Fontsize|3|Association to promoter expression in mouse samples}}
Line 170: Line 170:
}}
}}
----
----
<!--
<span id="export_tool"></span>
-->
<table id="m_pval_table"></table>
<table id="m_pval_table"></table>
<br><br>
<br><br>

Revision as of 14:19, 17 January 2020

name:{{{name}}}

Association to promoter expression in human samples<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, human <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




Association to promoter expression in mouse samples <b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, mouse <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




GREAT analysis results for human <b>Summary:</b>Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data


GO IDGO Termp-value
{{{great_results_human}}}


GREAT analysis results for mouseGenomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source dataset <br>data

GO IDGO Termp-value
{{{great_results_mouse}}}