Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3573: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C3573_liver_Bronchial_Mesenchymal_Fibroblast_Tracheal_Keratinocyte_Mammary
 

Latest revision as of 12:28, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3573_liver_Bronchial_Mesenchymal_Fibroblast_Tracheal_Keratinocyte_Mammary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:56643233..56643256,+p@chr16:56643233..56643256
+
Hg19::chr16:56643260..56643307,+p@chr16:56643260..56643307
+
Hg19::chr16:56643282..56643333,-p@chr16:56643282..56643333
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cell layer2.26e-26309
epithelium3.06e-25306
multilaminar epithelium1.21e-1983
unilaminar epithelium1.48e-19148
epithelial vesicle1.71e-1978
epithelial tube4.12e-19117
organism subdivision5.64e-19264
multi-tissue structure1.38e-17342
vasculature2.13e-1778
vascular system2.13e-1778
trunk6.66e-17199
anatomical conduit6.70e-17240
somite1.10e-1671
presomitic mesoderm1.10e-1671
presumptive segmental plate1.10e-1671
dermomyotome1.10e-1671
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.10e-1671
dense mesenchyme tissue2.14e-1673
paraxial mesoderm3.41e-1672
presumptive paraxial mesoderm3.41e-1672
trunk mesenchyme7.10e-16122
vessel4.84e-1568
mesenchyme6.60e-15160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.60e-15160
anatomical cluster5.93e-14373
tube6.15e-14192
artery7.91e-1442
arterial blood vessel7.91e-1442
arterial system7.91e-1442
skeletal muscle tissue1.12e-1362
striated muscle tissue1.12e-1362
myotome1.12e-1362
epithelial tube open at both ends2.90e-1359
blood vessel2.90e-1359
blood vasculature2.90e-1359
vascular cord2.90e-1359
muscle tissue7.37e-1364
musculature7.37e-1364
musculature of body7.37e-1364
anatomical system1.75e-11624
anatomical group2.91e-11625
circulatory system4.34e-11112
systemic artery5.20e-1133
systemic arterial system5.20e-1133
cardiovascular system6.24e-11109
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm9.20e-1183
multi-cellular organism6.37e-10656
developing anatomical structure3.08e-09581
embryo1.71e-08592
embryonic structure2.20e-08564
germ layer5.04e-08560
germ layer / neural crest5.04e-08560
embryonic tissue5.04e-08560
presumptive structure5.04e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure5.04e-08560
epiblast (generic)5.04e-08560
nephron epithelium1.74e-0715
renal tubule1.74e-0715
nephron tubule1.74e-0715
nephron1.74e-0715
uriniferous tubule1.74e-0715
nephrogenic mesenchyme1.74e-0715
excretory tube3.89e-0716
kidney epithelium3.89e-0716
surface structure5.12e-0799


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.0927
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.758317
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.13.37768
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.15.8296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.15.21573
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.13.21605
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.11.66081
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.22.07011
MA0039.20.0526989
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.12.02721
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.09178
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
GATA2#2624312.7449317335540.0004829527704283790.00436626596180484
GATA3#2625327.2365163572064.94721007899563e-050.000850504812247283
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276208960791636
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00247912286465492
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00614733900092997



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.