Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3240: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C3240_immature_CD14_Mast_Hair_Basophils_CD34_embryonic
 

Latest revision as of 12:22, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3240_immature_CD14_Mast_Hair_Basophils_CD34_embryonic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:111843149..111843189,-p@chr12:111843149..111843189
-
Hg19::chr17:75319211..75319234,-p@chr17:75319211..75319234
-
Hg19::chr3:5022272..5022321,+p7@BHLHE40


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.34e-2542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.34e-2542
defensive cell5.30e-2348
phagocyte5.30e-2348
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.11e-2167
myeloid leukocyte1.50e-2072
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.93e-1966
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.04e-1861
monopoietic cell2.91e-1759
monocyte2.91e-1759
monoblast2.91e-1759
promonocyte2.91e-1759
leukocyte1.83e-16136
mesenchymal cell2.69e-15354
myeloid cell3.21e-15108
common myeloid progenitor3.21e-15108
connective tissue cell2.50e-14361
hematopoietic cell1.54e-12177
motile cell1.84e-12386
multi fate stem cell1.96e-12427
hematopoietic stem cell5.10e-12168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.10e-12168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.80e-12120
stem cell1.33e-11441
somatic stem cell1.63e-11433
nongranular leukocyte7.20e-11115
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.20e-10161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.20e-10161
stuff accumulating cell2.27e-1087
somatic cell6.03e-09588
animal cell3.10e-08679
eukaryotic cell3.10e-08679
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow8.30e-1976
bone element2.16e-1882
skeletal element1.67e-1690
hematopoietic system3.59e-1698
blood island3.59e-1698
skeletal system2.57e-15100
connective tissue6.71e-14371
hemolymphoid system7.83e-14108
immune system8.55e-1493
lateral plate mesoderm1.29e-09203
musculoskeletal system4.24e-09167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.0927
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.11.88666
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.11.70328
MA0059.11.70014
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0834661
MA0074.12.15449
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.11.16674
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.15986
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.21.20011
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.21.34467
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.12.30945
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.12.02335
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.776149
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.311277
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538216.23853452820240.004917462407809970.022993143642965
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.027856017330118
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.032074646779179
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00912830423161144
JUNB#3726220.40708843988080.003131462199438740.0164452547215358
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156265144622183
NR3C1#290829.982015554115360.01278474365547170.0460152959518148
RXRA#6256213.38307809275550.007196434429465730.0298178376330624
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00202638235898112
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.0457157962555203
TFAP2A#7020211.01242291536330.01054990655215560.0389970160119128
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.032820235069731
ZEB1#6935211.25895467836260.01010222676646330.0378010985368729



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C3240&oldid=3070357"