Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2425: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.303848004574266,0

Latest revision as of 12:05, 17 September 2013


Full id: C2425_MCF7_Melanocyte_normal_Fibroblast_rhabdomyosarcoma_Smooth_lung



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:59477197..59477212,+p2@TBX2
Hg19::chr17:59477233..59477263,+p1@TBX2
Hg19::chr17:59477266..59477273,+p6@TBX2
Hg19::chr17:59477275..59477286,+p3@TBX2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
multi-tissue structure1.06e-23342
organism subdivision1.58e-20264
mesenchyme1.09e-19160
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.09e-19160
dense mesenchyme tissue2.38e-1673
somite5.06e-1671
presomitic mesoderm5.06e-1671
presumptive segmental plate5.06e-1671
dermomyotome5.06e-1671
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.06e-1671
paraxial mesoderm5.61e-1672
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.61e-1672
trunk8.34e-16199
trunk mesenchyme9.55e-16122
epithelial vesicle4.88e-1578
muscle tissue5.44e-1564
musculature5.44e-1564
musculature of body5.44e-1564
skeletal muscle tissue2.43e-1462
striated muscle tissue2.43e-1462
myotome2.43e-1462
anatomical cluster9.29e-13373
multilaminar epithelium1.76e-1283
cell layer1.43e-11309
epithelium1.85e-11306
multi-cellular organism1.11e-10656
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest1.83e-08132
unilaminar epithelium6.99e-08148
anatomical system1.05e-07624
anatomical group1.27e-07625
adult organism1.34e-07114


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.92335
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.14.341
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.28333
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.11.80156
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.841508
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.11.93422
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.12.01976
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.11.63368
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.112.4409
MA0146.12.31379
MA0147.11.16748
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.777367
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.21.01696
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.25.79077
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.11.84959
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.649108
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.15.0369
MA0163.11.90765
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.29.35212
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.00434183501393493
FOXA1#3169411.08141974938556.62943068949433e-050.00107012536596615
FOXA2#3170424.63046375266522.71504128667089e-069.4236024240153e-05
GATA3#2625427.2365163572061.81561517799785e-066.77217977053275e-05
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0185950192016115
REST#597849.650028716128020.0001152825614219170.00156975168609434
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0322049008687891
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244075542778212



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C2425&oldid=3069542"