Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1512: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0.

Latest revision as of 11:46, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1512_Smooth_hepatic_mesenchymal_Mallassezderived_Small_Gingival_Ewing



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:145788942..145788958,-p7@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145789101..145789120,-p5@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145824416..145824437,-p@chr3:145824416..145824437
-
Hg19::chr3:145838965..145839010,+p@chr3:145838965..145839010
+
Hg19::chr3:145878962..145878979,-p1@PLOD2
Hg19::chr3:145879113..145879126,-p2@PLOD2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
unilaminar epithelium6.83e-19148
vasculature2.73e-1878
vascular system2.73e-1878
artery1.91e-1742
arterial blood vessel1.91e-1742
arterial system1.91e-1742
epithelial tube open at both ends9.40e-1759
blood vessel9.40e-1759
blood vasculature9.40e-1759
vascular cord9.40e-1759
vessel1.26e-1668
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm3.37e-1683
epithelial tube1.40e-15117
trunk mesenchyme2.56e-15122
systemic artery9.44e-1533
systemic arterial system9.44e-1533
multilaminar epithelium1.45e-1483
mesenchyme3.09e-14160
entire embryonic mesenchyme3.09e-14160
skeletal muscle tissue5.62e-1462
striated muscle tissue5.62e-1462
myotome5.62e-1462
muscle tissue7.76e-1464
musculature7.76e-1464
musculature of body7.76e-1464
somite7.84e-1471
presomitic mesoderm7.84e-1471
presumptive segmental plate7.84e-1471
dermomyotome7.84e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.84e-1471
dense mesenchyme tissue1.05e-1373
paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.08e-1372
cardiovascular system5.49e-13109
circulatory system8.85e-13112
epithelial vesicle1.90e-1278
trunk2.19e-11199
organism subdivision6.32e-11264
multi-tissue structure1.78e-09342
anatomical cluster2.65e-09373
multi-cellular organism3.29e-09656
epithelium4.50e-09306
cell layer4.66e-09309
aorta1.04e-0821
aortic system1.04e-0821
anatomical conduit4.27e-07240
smooth muscle tissue6.58e-0715
anatomical system8.53e-07624
blood vessel smooth muscle9.70e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle9.70e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue9.70e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue9.70e-0710
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer4.89e-0814


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.756372
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.11.33289
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.491287
MA0017.10.432438
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.11.41501
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.10.906394
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.213007
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.450439
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.737586
MA0061.10.23892
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.10.0214749
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.10.763954
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.0971959
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.10.522012
MA0093.11.02138
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.10.381434
MA0105.10.134725
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.320267
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.504913
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.323925
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.10.226048
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.10.725558
MA0144.10.299851
MA0145.10.347815
MA0146.10.232472
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.11.42897
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.200862
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.20.414885
MA0104.20.26661
MA0047.21.66123
MA0112.20.101413
MA0065.20.109623
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.10.132326
MA0155.10.0961854
MA0156.10.417278
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.875329
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0383129
MA0163.10.273773
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.20.394469
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.20.0146751
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.10.289793
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.