Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1468: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median=0,0

Latest revision as of 11:45, 17 September 2013


Full id: C1468_immature_CD14_Basophils_Monocytederived_migratory_Peripheral_Macrophage



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:192520178..192520200,-p@chr1:192520178..192520200
-
Hg19::chr2:235314156..235314171,-p@chr2:235314156..235314171
-
Hg19::chr2:61110347..61110358,+p@chr2:61110347..61110358
+
Hg19::chr2:8379719..8379724,-p@chr2:8379719..8379724
-
Hg19::chr7:151534954..151535001,+p@chr7:151534954..151535001
+
Hg19::chrX:13023985..13024011,+p@chrX:13023985..13024011
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte5.57e-9542
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.57e-9542
defensive cell6.63e-8248
phagocyte6.63e-8248
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.16e-7667
myeloid leukocyte5.19e-7472
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.28e-7361
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.24e-6966
leukocyte4.34e-69136
monopoietic cell2.37e-6759
monocyte2.37e-6759
monoblast2.37e-6759
promonocyte2.37e-6759
myeloid cell2.99e-62108
common myeloid progenitor2.99e-62108
hematopoietic stem cell7.16e-56168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.16e-56168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.62e-54120
hematopoietic cell2.06e-52177
nongranular leukocyte6.51e-52115
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell7.47e-52161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell7.47e-52161
stuff accumulating cell6.82e-4187
intermediate monocyte4.90e-239
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.90e-239
mesenchymal cell5.52e-21354
connective tissue cell2.50e-20361
motile cell5.06e-18386
Langerhans cell6.24e-175
multi fate stem cell3.36e-15427
stem cell3.56e-15441
somatic stem cell8.25e-15433
conventional dendritic cell7.19e-138
basophil1.14e-103
single nucleate cell1.18e-103
mononuclear cell1.18e-103
dendritic cell2.13e-1010
natural killer cell5.89e-103
pro-NK cell5.89e-103
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.04e-082
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell2.04e-082
somatic cell2.20e-07588
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow7.66e-7076
bone element5.23e-6482
hematopoietic system2.51e-6398
blood island2.51e-6398
immune system5.65e-5893
skeletal element2.00e-5790
hemolymphoid system1.82e-56108
skeletal system1.15e-50100
musculoskeletal system3.71e-26167
lateral plate mesoderm7.51e-25203
connective tissue1.95e-19371
mesoderm7.54e-13315
mesoderm-derived structure7.54e-13315
presumptive mesoderm7.54e-13315


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00461978
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.10.539222
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.0254709
MA0017.11.10421
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.10.152639
MA0050.11.34656
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.0586456
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.450439
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.10.671725
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.10.00076337
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.10.763954
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.0971959
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.10.522012
MA0093.10.394379
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.10.381434
MA0105.10.419295
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.857383
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.504913
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.323925
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.10.226048
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.11.15452
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.11.72302
MA0144.10.811435
MA0145.10.107156
MA0146.10.093337
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.10.584698
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.0313803
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.709311
MA0137.20.414885
MA0104.20.26661
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.20.101413
MA0065.20.109623
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.10.132326
MA0155.10.65596
MA0156.10.417278
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.328286
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0383129
MA0163.10.0270301
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.21.02158
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.20.0146751
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.10.289793
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
NFKB1#479043.658708949462560.01207927289015230.0438372083318721



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C1468&oldid=3068585"