MCL coexpression mm9:552

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

	Short description
Mm9::chr10:4795834..4795904,+	p2@Syne1
Mm9::chr10:5151486..5151504,+	p10@Syne1
Mm9::chr10:9620958..9621048,-	p1@Stxbp5
Mm9::chr13:41701236..41701271,+	p1@Tmem170b
Mm9::chr16:22657321..22657333,-	p4@Dgkg
Mm9::chr19:10599672..10599687,-	p3@Sdhaf2
Mm9::chr1:23389988..23390064,-	p1@Ogfrl1
Mm9::chr2:23904348..23904366,-	p1@Hnmt
Mm9::chr2:23904377..23904388,-	p3@Hnmt
Mm9::chr4:70195938..70196021,-	p1@Megf9
Mm9::chr8:122638044..122638076,+	p1@6430548M08Rik
Mm9::chr9:105397367..105397447,-	p1@Atp2c1
Mm9::chr9:41932351..41932358,-	p4@Sorl1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:

---

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
regional part of nervous system	9.22e-12	54
ecto-epithelium	2.99e-11	73
neurectoderm	6.41e-11	64
neural plate	6.41e-11	64
presumptive neural plate	6.41e-11	64
neural tube	8.18e-11	52
neural rod	8.18e-11	52
future spinal cord	8.18e-11	52
neural keel	8.18e-11	52
gray matter	2.33e-10	34
ectoderm-derived structure	4.42e-10	95
ectoderm	4.42e-10	95
presumptive ectoderm	4.42e-10	95
central nervous system	1.15e-09	73
anatomical conduit	3.43e-09	122
nervous system	6.84e-09	75
brain	8.29e-09	47
future brain	8.29e-09	47
regional part of brain	2.39e-08	46
pre-chordal neural plate	2.55e-08	49
brain grey matter	3.05e-08	29
regional part of telencephalon	3.05e-08	29
telencephalon	3.05e-08	29
anterior neural tube	5.82e-08	40
tube	6.09e-08	114
regional part of forebrain	1.65e-07	39
forebrain	1.65e-07	39
future forebrain	1.65e-07	39
occipital lobe	1.77e-07	10
visual cortex	1.77e-07	10
neocortex	1.77e-07	10
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest	4.86e-07	92

TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}