Coexpression cluster:C2979

Full id: C2979_Neutrophils_parietal_brain_occipital_CD4_CD14CD16_temporal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:11228276..11228288,+	p@chr10:11228276..11228288 +
Hg19::chr10:11254721..11254723,+	p@chr10:11254721..11254723 +
Hg19::chr10:11293261..11293262,+	p@chr10:11293261..11293262 +

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
hematopoietic stem cell	5.31e-41	168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell	5.31e-41	168
hematopoietic cell	2.69e-38	177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell	3.29e-37	161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell	3.29e-37	161
leukocyte	1.03e-34	136
nongranular leukocyte	2.13e-26	115
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell	1.12e-24	120
myeloid cell	3.76e-19	108
common myeloid progenitor	3.76e-19	108
lymphocyte	2.07e-17	53
common lymphoid progenitor	2.07e-17	53
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell	3.75e-17	52
nucleate cell	6.30e-17	55
myeloid leukocyte	5.89e-14	72
T cell	4.20e-12	25
pro-T cell	4.20e-12	25
mature alpha-beta T cell	6.40e-11	18
alpha-beta T cell	6.40e-11	18
immature T cell	6.40e-11	18
mature T cell	6.40e-11	18
immature alpha-beta T cell	6.40e-11	18
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell	9.06e-10	66
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell	6.96e-09	67
monopoietic cell	1.60e-08	59
monocyte	1.60e-08	59
monoblast	1.60e-08	59
promonocyte	1.60e-08	59
intermediate monocyte	5.99e-08	9
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte	5.99e-08	9
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor	7.72e-08	61
classical monocyte	8.12e-07	42
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte	8.12e-07	42
granulocyte	8.34e-07	8

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	7.50e-23	114
neural tube	3.44e-15	56
neural rod	3.44e-15	56
future spinal cord	3.44e-15	56
neural keel	3.44e-15	56
regional part of forebrain	2.03e-14	41
forebrain	2.03e-14	41
anterior neural tube	2.03e-14	41
future forebrain	2.03e-14	41
regional part of nervous system	2.05e-14	53
regional part of brain	2.05e-14	53
hematopoietic system	5.71e-14	98
blood island	5.71e-14	98
brain grey matter	2.87e-12	34
gray matter	2.87e-12	34
hemolymphoid system	3.49e-12	108
telencephalon	4.98e-12	34
regional part of telencephalon	1.02e-11	32
cerebral hemisphere	2.53e-11	32
regional part of cerebral cortex	9.12e-11	22
brain	3.13e-10	68
future brain	3.13e-10	68
cerebral cortex	5.56e-10	25
pallium	5.56e-10	25
central nervous system	5.81e-10	81
neocortex	8.02e-10	20
neural plate	9.99e-10	82
presumptive neural plate	9.99e-10	82
neurectoderm	6.01e-09	86
blood	2.16e-08	15
haemolymphatic fluid	2.16e-08	15
organism substance	2.16e-08	15
pre-chordal neural plate	2.86e-08	61
nervous system	2.09e-07	89
immune system	2.57e-07	93
bone marrow	8.57e-07	76

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
leukemia	2.24e-08	39
hematologic cancer	5.56e-07	51
immune system cancer	5.56e-07	51
myeloid leukemia	5.56e-07	31

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.