Coexpression cluster:C2192

Full id: C2192_small_signet_gastric_adenocarcinoma_colon_bile_duodenum

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:12223867..12223883,+	p1@BCL2L14
Hg19::chr2:241544820..241544829,+	p6@GPR35
Hg19::chr2:241544834..241544861,+	p2@GPR35
Hg19::chr2:241544866..241544882,+	p4@GPR35

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
neural tube	8.89e-35	56
neural rod	8.89e-35	56
future spinal cord	8.89e-35	56
neural keel	8.89e-35	56
adult organism	7.15e-33	114
regional part of nervous system	3.07e-32	53
regional part of brain	3.07e-32	53
organ system subdivision	8.77e-30	223
brain	1.43e-24	68
future brain	1.43e-24	68
brain grey matter	3.77e-23	34
gray matter	3.77e-23	34
telencephalon	4.76e-23	34
gastrointestinal system	7.19e-23	25
regional part of forebrain	1.21e-22	41
forebrain	1.21e-22	41
anterior neural tube	1.21e-22	41
future forebrain	1.21e-22	41
central nervous system	1.71e-22	81
neural plate	5.22e-21	82
presumptive neural plate	5.22e-21	82
regional part of telencephalon	4.74e-20	32
cerebral hemisphere	7.31e-20	32
neurectoderm	1.24e-19	86
intestine	2.07e-19	17
nervous system	2.15e-19	89
regional part of cerebral cortex	6.11e-19	22
neocortex	3.65e-18	20
cerebral cortex	2.57e-16	25
pallium	2.57e-16	25
anatomical cluster	8.29e-16	373
multi-tissue structure	1.07e-15	342
ecto-epithelium	8.90e-15	104
tube	1.10e-13	192
brainstem	1.63e-13	6
posterior neural tube	1.75e-13	15
chordal neural plate	1.75e-13	15
pre-chordal neural plate	2.27e-13	61
subdivision of digestive tract	1.64e-12	118
large intestine	2.61e-11	11
segmental subdivision of hindbrain	4.91e-11	12
hindbrain	4.91e-11	12
presumptive hindbrain	4.91e-11	12
anatomical conduit	7.14e-11	240
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest	7.81e-11	132
digestive system	2.53e-10	145
digestive tract	2.53e-10	145
primitive gut	2.53e-10	145
segmental subdivision of nervous system	4.45e-10	13
organ part	1.67e-09	218
gyrus	3.33e-09	6
small intestine	3.65e-09	4
organ	4.00e-09	503
lower digestive tract	7.21e-09	5
endoderm-derived structure	1.39e-08	160
endoderm	1.39e-08	160
presumptive endoderm	1.39e-08	160
neural nucleus	2.27e-08	9
nucleus of brain	2.27e-08	9
temporal lobe	2.48e-08	6
medulla oblongata	7.08e-08	3
myelencephalon	7.08e-08	3
future myelencephalon	7.08e-08	3
ectoderm-derived structure	1.14e-07	171
ectoderm	1.14e-07	171
presumptive ectoderm	1.14e-07	171
colon	2.20e-07	9
pons	2.62e-07	3
biliary system	6.58e-07	9
biliary tree	6.58e-07	9
biliary bud	6.58e-07	9

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
HNF4A#3172	3	17.3492177722153	0.000312564155748275	0.0032142465401924
HNF4G#3174	3	21.5650668948351	0.000163803242129261	0.00203563146177271

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.