Coexpression cluster:C3375

Full id: C3375_testis_parietal_brain_occipital_temporal_cerebellum_duodenum

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:45915545..45915601,+	p1@ENST00000412946 p1@ENST00000520590 p1@ENST00000520622
Hg19::chr15:77197781..77197801,-	p3@SCAPER
Hg19::chr22:42486923..42487002,+	p1@LOC100132273

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell	6.63e-07	52

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	1.28e-43	115
neural tube	6.64e-32	57
neural rod	6.64e-32	57
future spinal cord	6.64e-32	57
neural keel	6.64e-32	57
regional part of nervous system	1.50e-30	94
nervous system	1.50e-30	94
central nervous system	7.39e-30	82
regional part of brain	1.46e-28	59
brain	6.16e-26	69
future brain	6.16e-26	69
neurectoderm	1.70e-24	90
anterior neural tube	4.07e-24	42
regional part of forebrain	4.18e-24	41
forebrain	4.18e-24	41
future forebrain	4.18e-24	41
neural plate	3.45e-23	86
presumptive neural plate	3.45e-23	86
telencephalon	4.42e-20	34
gray matter	6.17e-20	34
brain grey matter	6.17e-20	34
regional part of telencephalon	1.82e-19	33
cerebral hemisphere	5.61e-19	32
pre-chordal neural plate	1.39e-16	61
ectoderm	8.73e-16	173
presumptive ectoderm	8.73e-16	173
regional part of cerebral cortex	1.27e-15	22
cerebral cortex	6.67e-15	25
pallium	6.67e-15	25
ectoderm-derived structure	1.01e-14	169
neocortex	2.15e-14	20
anterior region of body	1.82e-12	129
craniocervical region	1.82e-12	129
head	5.81e-11	123
posterior neural tube	7.33e-09	15
chordal neural plate	7.33e-09	15
segmental subdivision of nervous system	1.06e-07	13
segmental subdivision of hindbrain	3.77e-07	12
hindbrain	3.77e-07	12
presumptive hindbrain	3.77e-07	12

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
ATF3#467	3	22.4631745260087	8.81932387510763e-05	0.00129401709214999
CCNT2#905	3	6.33620157696263	0.00393075003576489	0.0189530749300669
CTCF#10664	3	5.36025637307503	0.006492509252767	0.0278754850503488
E2F1#1869	3	4.90738921487932	0.00846098534723939	0.0324194463323306
E2F6#1876	3	5.01715573169739	0.0079176980688633	0.0321132609170491
ELF1#1997	3	4.25809795880754	0.0129517987505461	0.0460829526695153
HNF4A#3172	2	15.4215269086358	0.00544421048668661	0.0246718692623042
HNF4G#3174	2	19.1689483509645	0.00354398661128422	0.0179692405911211
IRF1#3659	3	7.6371637535639	0.00224469274729724	0.0127777547192989
MAX#4149	3	6.45255550900712	0.00372191383426551	0.0186093909870191
MYC#4609	3	5.2222818716094	0.00702084375574015	0.029369939157484
SP1#6667	3	5.6983813781409	0.00540396270171217	0.0245833461366024
TRIM28#10155	2	12.3936833635083	0.00836834412943847	0.0328972594773375

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.