Coexpression cluster:C833

Full id: C833_pineal_parietal_occipital_temporal_duodenum_cerebellum_brain

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:75389975..75390011,-	p2@RPS6KL1
Hg19::chr14:93897057..93897102,+	p1@UNC79
Hg19::chr14:93897272..93897310,+	p2@UNC79
Hg19::chr16:89894845..89894856,+	p2@SPIRE2
Hg19::chr17:19314365..19314387,+	p3@RNF112
Hg19::chr1:151689259..151689285,-	p1@CELF3
Hg19::chr1:45672027..45672050,-	p1@ZSWIM5
Hg19::chr1:65775204..65775248,+	p4@DNAJC6
Hg19::chr5:131705540..131705599,-	p1@LOC553103
Hg19::chr9:109625401..109625458,+	p1@ZNF462

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
adult organism	1.93e-44	115
regional part of nervous system	1.33e-36	94
nervous system	1.33e-36	94
central nervous system	6.06e-36	82
neural tube	2.40e-32	57
neural rod	2.40e-32	57
future spinal cord	2.40e-32	57
neural keel	2.40e-32	57
brain	1.47e-29	69
future brain	1.47e-29	69
regional part of brain	6.26e-27	59
anterior neural tube	8.31e-26	42
regional part of forebrain	8.55e-26	41
forebrain	8.55e-26	41
future forebrain	8.55e-26	41
neural plate	1.11e-25	86
presumptive neural plate	1.11e-25	86
ectoderm-derived structure	1.11e-25	169
ectoderm	1.54e-25	173
presumptive ectoderm	1.54e-25	173
neurectoderm	4.22e-25	90
telencephalon	2.23e-21	34
gray matter	2.54e-21	34
brain grey matter	2.54e-21	34
head	4.42e-21	123
anterior region of body	8.81e-21	129
craniocervical region	8.81e-21	129
regional part of telencephalon	9.39e-21	33
cerebral hemisphere	2.33e-20	32
pre-chordal neural plate	1.89e-19	61
cerebral cortex	3.90e-16	25
pallium	3.90e-16	25
anatomical conduit	1.26e-15	241
regional part of cerebral cortex	1.64e-15	22
anatomical cluster	6.27e-15	286
neocortex	2.79e-14	20
multi-tissue structure	7.78e-14	347
tube	6.71e-13	194
organism subdivision	1.63e-10	365
organ part	8.08e-10	219
epithelium	2.23e-09	309
cell layer	2.94e-09	312
embryo	3.25e-09	612
multi-cellular organism	8.35e-09	659
posterior neural tube	9.74e-08	15
chordal neural plate	9.74e-08	15
embryonic structure	1.46e-07	605
developing anatomical structure	1.46e-07	605
germ layer	2.38e-07	604
embryonic tissue	2.38e-07	604
presumptive structure	2.38e-07	604
epiblast (generic)	2.38e-07	604
anatomical system	2.59e-07	625
anatomical group	2.70e-07	626
organ	2.90e-07	511
basal ganglion	9.59e-07	9
nuclear complex of neuraxis	9.59e-07	9
aggregate regional part of brain	9.59e-07	9
collection of basal ganglia	9.59e-07	9
cerebral subcortex	9.59e-07	9

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
cell type cancer	4.16e-09	143
carcinoma	4.52e-07	106

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
REST#5978	5	4.82501435806401	0.00192138592617011	0.0112937654628141
YY1#7528	6	2.94670244991231	0.00698724787395188	0.0295393936491119
ZNF263#10127	5	4.11092081850534	0.00394439922578783	0.0189611116055443

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.