Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2096: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C2096_cerebellum_thalamus_substantia_globus_occipital_brain_optic |id=C2096 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|full_id=C2096_cerebellum_thalamus_substantia_globus_occipital_brain_optic
|full_id=C2096_cerebellum_thalamus_substantia_globus_occipital_brain_optic
|id=C2096
|id=C2096
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=
|ontology_enrichment_disease=
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0000073!2.23e-36!94;UBERON:0001016!2.23e-36!94;UBERON:0007023!3.73e-36!115;UBERON:0001049!5.92e-36!57;UBERON:0005068!5.92e-36!57;UBERON:0006241!5.92e-36!57;UBERON:0007135!5.92e-36!57;UBERON:0001017!8.14e-35!82;UBERON:0005743!2.06e-34!86;UBERON:0000955!2.77e-30!69;UBERON:0006238!2.77e-30!69;UBERON:0002780!4.18e-29!41;UBERON:0001890!4.18e-29!41;UBERON:0006240!4.18e-29!41;UBERON:0002346!1.55e-28!90;UBERON:0002616!1.83e-28!59;UBERON:0003080!6.14e-28!42;UBERON:0003075!9.62e-28!86;UBERON:0007284!9.62e-28!86;UBERON:0002020!1.35e-23!34;UBERON:0003528!1.35e-23!34;UBERON:0001893!1.75e-23!34;UBERON:0002791!9.76e-23!33;UBERON:0001869!8.05e-22!32;UBERON:0003056!2.85e-20!61;UBERON:0000924!8.57e-20!173;UBERON:0006601!8.57e-20!173;UBERON:0000153!3.48e-19!129;UBERON:0007811!3.48e-19!129;UBERON:0004121!5.87e-19!169;UBERON:0000033!1.31e-17!123;UBERON:0002619!2.89e-17!22;UBERON:0000956!1.89e-16!25;UBERON:0000203!1.89e-16!25;UBERON:0001950!1.13e-15!20;UBERON:0003076!4.49e-09!15;UBERON:0003057!4.49e-09!15;UBERON:0002308!1.04e-08!9;UBERON:0000125!1.04e-08!9;UBERON:0002420!1.12e-08!9;UBERON:0007245!1.12e-08!9;UBERON:0010009!1.12e-08!9;UBERON:0010011!1.12e-08!9;UBERON:0000454!1.12e-08!9;UBERON:0004732!1.52e-07!13;UBERON:0009663!4.29e-07!7;UBERON:0001894!4.56e-07!7;UBERON:0006222!4.56e-07!7;UBERON:0004733!9.46e-07!12;UBERON:0002028!9.46e-07!12;UBERON:0007277!9.46e-07!12
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:19, 21 May 2012


Full id: C2096_cerebellum_thalamus_substantia_globus_occipital_brain_optic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:112834886..112834890,+p@chr11:112834886..112834890
+
Hg19::chr1:171904935..171904938,+p@chr1:171904935..171904938
+
Hg19::chr1:172001694..172001701,+p@chr1:172001694..172001701
+
Hg19::chr2:25288238..25288242,+p@chr2:25288238..25288242
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system2.23e-3694
nervous system2.23e-3694
adult organism3.73e-36115
neural tube5.92e-3657
neural rod5.92e-3657
future spinal cord5.92e-3657
neural keel5.92e-3657
central nervous system8.14e-3582
brain2.77e-3069
future brain2.77e-3069
regional part of forebrain4.18e-2941
forebrain4.18e-2941
future forebrain4.18e-2941
neurectoderm1.55e-2890
regional part of brain1.83e-2859
anterior neural tube6.14e-2842
neural plate9.62e-2886
presumptive neural plate9.62e-2886
gray matter1.35e-2334
brain grey matter1.35e-2334
telencephalon1.75e-2334
regional part of telencephalon9.76e-2333
cerebral hemisphere8.05e-2232
pre-chordal neural plate2.85e-2061
ectoderm8.57e-20173
presumptive ectoderm8.57e-20173
anterior region of body3.48e-19129
craniocervical region3.48e-19129
ectoderm-derived structure5.87e-19169
head1.31e-17123
regional part of cerebral cortex2.89e-1722
cerebral cortex1.89e-1625
pallium1.89e-1625
neocortex1.13e-1520
posterior neural tube4.49e-0915
chordal neural plate4.49e-0915
nucleus of brain1.04e-089
neural nucleus1.04e-089
basal ganglion1.12e-089
nuclear complex of neuraxis1.12e-089
aggregate regional part of brain1.12e-089
collection of basal ganglia1.12e-089
cerebral subcortex1.12e-089
segmental subdivision of nervous system1.52e-0713
telencephalic nucleus4.29e-077
diencephalon4.56e-077
future diencephalon4.56e-077
segmental subdivision of hindbrain9.46e-0712
hindbrain9.46e-0712
presumptive hindbrain9.46e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.