Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2284: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C2284_occipital_brain_hippocampus_medial_medulla_amygdala_cerebellum |id=C2284 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{{Coexpression_clusters
|full_id=C2284_occipital_brain_hippocampus_medial_medulla_amygdala_cerebellum
|full_id=C2284_occipital_brain_hippocampus_medial_medulla_amygdala_cerebellum
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0015334!high affinity oligopeptide transporter activity!0.00204086638570241!6565$GO:0022897!proton-dependent peptide secondary active transmembrane transporter activity!0.00204086638570241!6565$GO:0015333!peptide:hydrogen symporter activity!0.00204086638570241!6565$GO:0015295!solute:hydrogen symporter activity!0.00306120946214148!6565$GO:0015198!oligopeptide transporter activity!0.00367334321487522!6565$GO:0015197!peptide transporter activity!0.00408137230575627!6565$GO:0006857!oligopeptide transport!0.00650382537410799!6565$GO:0015893!drug transport!0.00650382537410799!6565$GO:0015833!peptide transport!0.0132584071746926!6565$GO:0042493!response to drug!0.0192688714762954!6565$GO:0015294!solute:cation symporter activity!0.0316738953436382!6565
|id=C2284
|id=C2284
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:37, 18 May 2012


Full id: C2284_occipital_brain_hippocampus_medial_medulla_amygdala_cerebellum



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:21490590..21490616,-p8@NDRG2
Hg19::chr14:21490622..21490648,-p9@NDRG2
Hg19::chr14:21490653..21490665,-p14@NDRG2
Hg19::chr3:121613362..121613373,+p4@SLC15A2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0015334high affinity oligopeptide transporter activity0.00204086638570241
GO:0022897proton-dependent peptide secondary active transmembrane transporter activity0.00204086638570241
GO:0015333peptide:hydrogen symporter activity0.00204086638570241
GO:0015295solute:hydrogen symporter activity0.00306120946214148
GO:0015198oligopeptide transporter activity0.00367334321487522
GO:0015197peptide transporter activity0.00408137230575627
GO:0006857oligopeptide transport0.00650382537410799
GO:0015893drug transport0.00650382537410799
GO:0015833peptide transport0.0132584071746926
GO:0042493response to drug0.0192688714762954
GO:0015294solute:cation symporter activity0.0316738953436382



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.