Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1643: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C1643_cerebellum_breast_pineal_spinal_acute_hippocampus_medulla |id=C1643 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{{Coexpression_clusters
|full_id=C1643_cerebellum_breast_pineal_spinal_acute_hippocampus_medulla
|full_id=C1643_cerebellum_breast_pineal_spinal_acute_hippocampus_medulla
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0051322!anaphase!0.0108906810524625!4926$GO:0000090!mitotic anaphase!0.0108906810524625!4926$GO:0005876!spindle microtubule!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0019079!viral genome replication!0.0197881225581302!4774$GO:0000922!spindle pole!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0043025!cell soma!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0006997!nuclear organization and biogenesis!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0030425!dendrite!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0016363!nuclear matrix!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0008017!microtubule binding!0.0197881225581302!4926$GO:0019058!viral infectious cycle!0.0197881225581302!4774$GO:0022415!viral reproductive process!0.0206764560402455!4774$GO:0015631!tubulin binding!0.0220289584636577!4926$GO:0051321!meiotic cell cycle!0.0220289584636577!4926$GO:0005819!spindle!0.0220289584636577!4926$GO:0043005!neuron projection!0.0220289584636577!4926
|id=C1643
|id=C1643
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:35, 18 May 2012


Full id: C1643_cerebellum_breast_pineal_spinal_acute_hippocampus_medulla



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:71791726..71791756,-p8@NUMA1
Hg19::chr1:150039659..150039684,-p@chr1:150039659..150039684
-
Hg19::chr1:61547894..61547968,+p2@NFIA
Hg19::chr1:61548069..61548102,+p3@NFIA
Hg19::chr1:61548118..61548129,+p9@NFIA


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0051322anaphase0.0108906810524625
GO:0000090mitotic anaphase0.0108906810524625
GO:0005876spindle microtubule0.0197881225581302
GO:0019079viral genome replication0.0197881225581302
GO:0000922spindle pole0.0197881225581302
GO:0043025cell soma0.0197881225581302
GO:0006997nuclear organization and biogenesis0.0197881225581302
GO:0030425dendrite0.0197881225581302
GO:0016363nuclear matrix0.0197881225581302
GO:0008017microtubule binding0.0197881225581302
GO:0019058viral infectious cycle0.0197881225581302
GO:0022415viral reproductive process0.0206764560402455
GO:0015631tubulin binding0.0220289584636577
GO:0051321meiotic cell cycle0.0220289584636577
GO:0005819spindle0.0220289584636577
GO:0043005neuron projection0.0220289584636577



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.